Doctor.Who.2005.S08E05.Time.Heist.720p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H.264-ECI[ra
- Type:
- Video > HD - TV shows
- Files:
- 3
- Size:
- 1.4 GiB (1500598789 Bytes)
- Tag(s):
- Doctor Who 2005 S08E05 Time Heist 720p WEB DD5 264 ECI rartv
- Uploaded:
- 2014-09-21 08:14:43 GMT
- By:
-
Drarbg
- Seeders:
- 1
- Leechers:
- 0
- Comments
- 10
- Info Hash: DFCDA87838A671F45C02624974F35361C36E30E4
(Problems with magnets links are fixed by upgrading your torrent client!)
https://rarbg.com Doctor.Who.2005.S08E05.Time.Heist.720p.WEB-DL.DD5.1.H.264-ECI[rartv] ----------------------------------------- Screens : http://imagecurl.org/viewer.php?file=63829128604264688350.jpg ----------------------------------------- Auto Media Info : Video Format........: AVC Codec ID............: V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC Length..............: 45mn26s Video...............: 960x718 ( 25.000fps ) Bitrate.............: 3930Kbps Audio Format........: AC-3 Codec ID............: A_AC3 Bit rate mode.......: Constant Bitrate.............: 384Kbps Channel(s)..........: 6 channels Embeded Subs........: English
| File list not available. |
Image cropped a bit again (of course, it could be done at production stage). To proof,
comparison of S08E04: http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/91589
comparison of S08E05: http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/92413
comparison of S08E04: http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/91589
comparison of S08E05: http://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/92413
@andymole,
Here's some conjecture for you.
The HDTV version would be broadcast with overscan factored in. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overscan
The picture area you'd normally see would probably be similar to the "cropped" web-dl version. When viewing broadcast video I don't think TVs let you disable overscanning.
Maybe the assumption is the web-dl video is more likely to be played without overscanning (using a PC monitor or TV with overscanning disabled) so the overscan area is cropped.
Just a theory.....
Here's some conjecture for you.
The HDTV version would be broadcast with overscan factored in. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overscan
The picture area you'd normally see would probably be similar to the "cropped" web-dl version. When viewing broadcast video I don't think TVs let you disable overscanning.
Maybe the assumption is the web-dl video is more likely to be played without overscanning (using a PC monitor or TV with overscanning disabled) so the overscan area is cropped.
Just a theory.....
It is very strange approach to crop the full source to imitate overscan.
And there was no any cropping in the first three episodes.
And there was no any cropping in the first three episodes.
Andymole, yes, you're right. Guess we have to stick with the other uploads with the full image. G2G has a 1080p but they always compress too much.
andymole,
As I said.... just a guess. I could be wrong.
Not that any of it matters this week (to me). It's finally happened. An episode of Doctor Who so boring, so incredibly uninteresting, so completely crap, I stopped watching halfway through.
After the first couple of episodes this season I thought "well that's it, we've hit rock bottom, it can only get better"...... but apparently not.....
Nothing to do with Peter Capaldi. He's doing a pretty good job considering.
As I said.... just a guess. I could be wrong.
Not that any of it matters this week (to me). It's finally happened. An episode of Doctor Who so boring, so incredibly uninteresting, so completely crap, I stopped watching halfway through.
After the first couple of episodes this season I thought "well that's it, we've hit rock bottom, it can only get better"...... but apparently not.....
Nothing to do with Peter Capaldi. He's doing a pretty good job considering.
andymole,
I didn't mean they've cropped the full source to imitate overscan, more the full source included an overscan area which could be cropped.
It depends how you look at it, I guess. ;)
Mind you, it could just be sloppy work at the production stage.... who knows. The web-dl video is probably straight from itunes with no re-encoding, so maybe it's a question only the BBC can answer.
I didn't mean they've cropped the full source to imitate overscan, more the full source included an overscan area which could be cropped.
It depends how you look at it, I guess. ;)
Mind you, it could just be sloppy work at the production stage.... who knows. The web-dl video is probably straight from itunes with no re-encoding, so maybe it's a question only the BBC can answer.
I wonder if I write another comment my previous one will appear again. It's odd the way comments on this site disappear and re-appear at times.
Why is it so difficult for someone to upload a 720/1080p HD version of a television show without:
a) destroying the resolution and cropping the video
b) destroying the audio by upmixing to 5.1 FROM stereo so that the lows disappear
c) Shit bitrate
I wish I had BBC or BBCAmerica so I can show these guys how it's done.
a) destroying the resolution and cropping the video
b) destroying the audio by upmixing to 5.1 FROM stereo so that the lows disappear
c) Shit bitrate
I wish I had BBC or BBCAmerica so I can show these guys how it's done.
Not the uploader's fault, guys. This is what the web downloads are, same as last week. Take it up with the BBC/Apple/Amazon. Or just download the 720p HDTV rip from BBC One and stop bitching.
@ TabascoQuesadilla,
There's nothing more annoying than people bitching about other people's bitching. You should stop bitching about it.
There's nothing more annoying than people bitching about other people's bitching. You should stop bitching about it.
Comments